Solaris Resources Inc. (SLSR)
🔔 Watch stock
Solaris Resources owns Warintza in Ecuador, one of the largest undeveloped copper deposits in the world — its own pre-feasibility study puts the after-tax net present value at $4.617 billion. The balance sheet as of March 31, 2026 shows $51.9 million of assets against $102.2 million of liabilities, and a deficit attributable to shareholders of $58.1 million. There is no bank debt at all: the gap comes from a $90 million gold prepayment Royal Gold made in May 2025, repayable in gold from a mine that will not produce for years. The auditor flags material uncertainty about the going concern, and a London fund has more than tripled its stake in twelve months. No investment advice — just the sober question of what a prepayment is worth while the mine exists only on paper.
Appears in These Scanners
This stock currently matches 3 of our scanner strategies — each hit links to the scanner.
Only genuine hits from verified scanners count; pure ranking metrics (P/E, P/S, and similar, which just sort the whole universe) don't count as a hit. View all scanners
Basics
Performance
Valuation
Profitability
Balance Sheet & Safety
Growth
Quality & Screener
AI Rating
ThreatenedGeprüft am 24.07.2026 gegen die vollständige SEC-Berichtslage der Solaris Resources Inc. (CIK 0002019103). Solaris ist kanadischer MJDS-Filer: Es gibt kein 10-K und kein 10-Q, ausgewertet wurden deshalb der Jahresbericht 40-F für 2025 (eingereicht 26.03.2026, Änderung 40-F/A vom 27.03.2026) samt seinen Anhängen — Annual Information Form, geprüfter IFRS-Jahresabschluss und Lagebericht (MD&A) — sowie der Zwischenbericht zum 31.03.2026 (6-K vom 14.05.2026) mit Abschluss und Lagebericht und die Mitteilungen vom 09.04.2026 und 30.06.2026. Befund: Sowohl die Annual Information Form (Item 7 „Risk Factors“) als auch der Lagebericht führen einen eigenen, überschriebenen Risikofaktor „Artificial intelligence“ — keine beiläufige Nennung, sondern ein Abschnitt mit konkretem Bezug auf das eigene Geschäftsmodell. Genannt werden drei Kanäle: erstens der Einsatz von KI in der Exploration durch Wettbewerber und der daraus folgende Verlust der eigenen Wettbewerbsposition, falls Solaris KI-Werkzeuge nicht wirksam integriert; zweitens Fehlentscheidungen durch intransparente Modelle; drittens KI-gestützte Cyberangriffe auf Gesellschaft, Beschäftigte und Partner. Exploration ist das gesamte Geschäft von Solaris — der Bezug ist damit unternehmensspezifisch und nicht bloße Formelsprache. Gegenprobe zu den höherrangigen Kategorien: KI ist keine Umsatzquelle (die Gesellschaft erzielt in allen acht berichteten Quartalen überhaupt keinen Umsatz), und in keinem der ausgewerteten Dokumente wird ein operativer KI-Einsatz beschrieben — die Begriffe „machine learning“ und „generative“ kommen kein einziges Mal vor. Nach dem Kriterienkatalog bleibt damit Rang 2 „bedroht“. Hinweis für die Fortschreibung: Solaris ist ein Explorer ohne Produktion; sollten Machbarkeitsstudie oder künftige Berichte einen konkreten KI-Einsatz in Geologie, Ressourcenmodellierung oder Anlagensteuerung belegen, wäre auf „nutzt“ umzustufen.
View the full file — quotes, sources, reviewed filings
„Increasingly, mining companies are leveraging AI, including but not limited to the use of AI to enhance exploration. Failure to effectively integrate AI tools into our business could result in an inability to strengthen and preserve our competitive positioning relative to industry peers."
Bergbauunternehmen setzen zunehmend künstliche Intelligenz ein, unter anderem zur Verbesserung der Exploration. Gelingt es uns nicht, KI-Werkzeuge wirksam in unser Geschäft zu integrieren, könnte dies dazu führen, dass wir unsere Wettbewerbsposition gegenüber Branchenkollegen nicht stärken und nicht halten können.
„In addition, AI models may not be sufficiently transparent in order to allow users to evaluate the accuracy or appropriateness of the output, which could result in inaccurate responses that could lead to errors in the Company’s decision-making or other business activities."
Darüber hinaus sind KI-Modelle möglicherweise nicht ausreichend transparent, als dass Nutzer die Richtigkeit oder Angemessenheit der Ergebnisse beurteilen könnten; daraus können unzutreffende Antworten entstehen, die zu Fehlern in der Entscheidungsfindung der Gesellschaft oder in anderen Geschäftsvorgängen führen.
„Additionally, others may use AI to increase the frequency and severity of cybersecurity attacks against the Company, its employees, consultants and partners. These risks could have a negative impact on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition."
Zudem können Dritte künstliche Intelligenz nutzen, um Häufigkeit und Schwere von Cyberangriffen auf die Gesellschaft, ihre Beschäftigten, Berater und Partner zu erhöhen. Diese Risiken können sich negativ auf Geschäft, Betriebsergebnis und Finanzlage der Gesellschaft auswirken.
Filings Reviewed: 40-F (Jahresbericht 2025) 2026-03-26 · 40-F Exhibit 99.1 (Annual Information Form 2025) 2026-03-26 · 40-F Exhibit 99.2 (geprüfter Jahresabschluss 2025, IFRS) 2026-03-26 · 40-F Exhibit 99.3 (Lagebericht/MD&A Geschäftsjahr 2025) 2026-03-26 · 6-K Exhibit 99.1 (Zwischenabschluss zum 31.03.2026) 2026-05-14 · 6-K Exhibit 99.2 (Lagebericht/MD&A Q1 2026) 2026-05-14
Rated on July 24, 2026 · How the Rating Is Built
Highlighted are things our editorial team noticed: green = stands out as strong, red = deserves a closer look. No single metric is a verdict on its own — always read it in context.
Quarterly Figures
| Quarter | EPS (Earnings Per Share) | EPS YoY (%) | Sales ($M) | Sales YoY (%) | Net Margin (%) | OCF ($M) | FCF ($M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024: Q2 | -0.12 | -100.00 | 0 | – | – | -12 | -12 |
| 2024: Q3 | -0.13 | -116.70 | 0 | – | – | -17 | -17 |
| 2024: Q4 | -0.16 | -128.60 | 0 | – | – | -20 | -21 |
| 2025: Q1 | -0.10 | -25.00 | 0 | – | – | -17 | -18 |
| 2025: Q2 | -0.02 | 83.30 | 0 | – | – | 85 | 84 |
| 2025: Q3 | -0.07 | 46.20 | 0 | – | – | -12 | -12 |
| 2025: Q4 | -0.06 | 62.50 | 0 | – | – | -7 | -10 |
| 2026: Q1 | -0.03 | 70.00 | 0 | – | – | -5 | -13 |
- EPS (Earnings Per Share):
- Quarterly profit divided by the total share count — how much of the profit works out to a single share.
- YoY (Year over Year):
- Change versus the same quarter a year ago — this is how you compare without seasonal distortion (e.g. the holiday shopping season).
- Sales:
- All revenue for the quarter, before any costs are deducted — the top line of the income statement.
- Net Margin:
- What percentage of sales is left over as profit in the end. Negative means the company is posting a loss.
- OCF (Operating Cash Flow):
- The cash that actually flows into the till from the core business during the quarter — harder to dress up than book profit.
- FCF (Free Cash Flow):
- Operating cash flow minus capital expenditures — the money that's genuinely free to use, say for paying down debt, buybacks, or dividends.
Assessment: Opportunities & Risks
The pre-feasibility study of November 6, 2025 delivered a maiden reserve: 1.3 billion tonnes at 0.41 percent copper equivalent, containing 4.1 million tonnes of copper, over a 22-year life at roughly 156,000 tonnes of annual production. After-tax net present value is $4.617 billion, the internal rate of return 26 percent, and all-in sustaining cost in the first five years $0.85 per pound of copper — that would sit in the cheapest quartile of the industry. Measured and indicated resources rose 312 percent against the 2024 estimate.
As of March 31, 2026, total assets of $51.910 million stood against $102.229 million of liabilities; the deficit attributable to shareholders was $58.148 million and the accumulated deficit $329.766 million. There is no bank debt — the largest liability is $93.171 million of deferred revenue from the Royal Gold prepayment, accreted at 4.6 percent and secured by an all-asset general security agreement and a pledge over the intermediate holding company. Cash was $12.894 million; a further $50.0 million from the second instalment arrived on April 14, 2026.
Auditor BDO Canada devotes a separate section of its 2025 opinion to going-concern uncertainty. The interim report gets specific: on its own spending plan, Solaris needs the third $50 million Royal Gold instalment to fund operations for twelve months. That instalment fell due on the first anniversary of closing, May 21, 2026, and is conditional on full perfection of Ecuadorian-law security; as of July 24, 2026 nothing about it had been filed with the SEC — the most recent filing is the Form 6-K of June 30, 2026 on the annual meeting.
Across the mine life the study models $2.529 billion of royalties on roughly $42.4 billion of gross revenue: 2 percent to South32 on four core concessions, 4 percent to the Ecuadorian state plus 20 percent corporate income tax and 15 percent profit sharing, and 0.3 to 0.6 percent to Royal Gold. From the gold stream itself Solaris books just $131 million of revenue over the entire life. Offtake is committed under the Orion contract to at least 30,000 tonnes of copper and 1,500 tonnes of molybdenum a year for 20 years. The present value calculation already accounts for all of it.
On April 9, 2026, after eighteen months of review, the Environmental Impact Assessment received technical approval — the biggest permitting step so far. Still open are the government-led consultation process and the exploitation agreements; the company targets the end of 2026. Relations with neighbours are formalized to an unusual degree: 2,349.67 hectares of surface rights returned, agreements with the Shuar centres of Warints and Yawi since 2020, with the FICSH federation since 2024 and with Pueblo Shuar Arutam since September 2025. The annual report nevertheless records that further development is largely contingent on that support — Warintza sat idle for twelve years from late 2006.
Solaris Resources is the retainer trap in its purest form. The Warintza copper project in Ecuador is real, independently verified and technically approved on the environmental side since April 9, 2026; its own pre-feasibility study calculates an after-tax present value of $4.617 billion. The balance sheet behind it shows, as of March 31, 2026, $51.9 million of assets, $102.2 million of liabilities and a deficit attributable to shareholders of $58.1 million — without a cent of bank debt, because the largest item is a $90 million Royal Gold gold prepayment repayable in future deliveries. The auditor flags material uncertainty about the going concern, the third $50 million instalment came due on May 21, 2026 and remained unreported as of July 24, 2026, and $3.7 billion of construction cost is unfunded. Not investment advice.
- Solaris Resources reached our research list not through a scanner hit but through the Form 13F-HR of Helikon Investments Ltd (London) as of March 31, 2026: 15,545,845 shares worth $133,383,350, one of 17 positions in a $2,648,555,113 portfolio. The fund more than tripled the position in twelve months (June 30, 2025: 4,811,620 shares), adding 72.3 percent in the first quarter of 2026 alone. In a Schedule 13G filing of May 7, 2026 it reported 17,488,787 shares, or 10.47 percent, as of April 30, 2026. A 13F shows only U.S.-listed long positions with a 35- to 45-day delay, excluding short sales and derivatives — a rear-view mirror, not a route map.
- Solaris Resources is a Canadian MJDS filer with the SEC: there is no 10-K and no 10-Q. The audited package appears once a year on Form 40-F (for 2025 filed March 26, 2026, auditor BDO Canada LLP; amended on Form 40-F/A on March 27, 2026), and interim figures are furnished only as an unaudited exhibit to a Form 6-K. Accounting is IFRS in U.S. dollars, amounts in thousands. Reserves and resources follow the Canadian NI 43-101 standard and differ from U.S. requirements.
- Do not confuse the names: there is a different, unrelated company with a similar name (Solaris Energy Infrastructure). This analysis covers Solaris Resources Inc. only, TSX: SLS and NYSE American: SLSR, CIK 0002019103. The U.S. listing has been in place since April 19, 2024; OTCQB trading ceased at the same time, so data sheets still describing the stock as an OTC name are out of date.
- Valuation figures are dated and evergreen: the implied price of about $8.58 per share comes from the 13F filing as of March 31, 2026 ($133,383,350 for 15,545,845 shares) and serves as an order of magnitude, not a daily price; the resulting market value of roughly $1.43 billion assumes 167,035,328 shares outstanding at the same date. The comparison with a $4.617 billion present value comes from the pre-feasibility study of November 6, 2025 and assumes a copper price of $4.50 per pound across 22 years. All figures as of July 24, 2026.
About the Company
Solaris Resources Inc. engages in the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties. It focuses on exploring copper, molybdenum molybdenum, gold, lead, zinc, and silver. It owns interests in Warintza project located in southeastern Ecuador in the province of Morona Santiago, Canton Limon Indanza; and the Tamarugo project located in northern Chile. The company also holds interests in the La Verde project located in the Sierra Madre del Sur west of Mexico City in Michoacán State, Mexico; and the Capricho and Paco Orco projects in Peru. In addition, it has an option agreement to acquire up to a 100% interest in 10 new explorations concessions; and has an option to acquire up to a 100% interest in a new portfolio of exploration areas ("Solaris 2") located immediately adjacent to the Warintza Project in southeastern Ecuador. The company was formerly known as Solaris Copper Inc. and changed its name to Solaris Resources Inc. in December 2019. Solaris Resources Inc. was incorporated in 2018 and is headquartered in Baar, Switzerland.
Chart
Interactive price chart (TradingView).
Data as of: July 24, 2026 · Source: fundamental data & SEC filings (annual and quarterly reports, 10-K/10-Q)
Note: pure fact-based analysis, not investment advice and not a solicitation to buy or sell. All figures without guarantee.